MOTmotdata.uk

Honda Cr-V

MOT data from 307,496 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 83.9%. Average mileage at test: 94,018 miles.

Common failure reasons

ReasonCount
a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn12,559
tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements6,456
the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements6,002
a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated5,856
a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc5,324
steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated5,216
the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired5,055
a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm4,475
a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4,041
a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources4,019

Pass rate by fuel type

FuelTestsPass rate
Petrol144,98382.8%
Diesel139,28083%
Hybrid23,11596.7%
LP10773.8%

By registration year

YearTestsPass rate
199722871.5%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
19981,00566.1%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
19991,37168.1%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
20001,10766.2%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated
20011,77870.6%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
20024,82269.2%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
20037,55369.2%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements
20049,44870%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200513,83871%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired
200615,61872.4%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated
200724,69575.1%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200817,92176.9%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
200915,69279.5%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated
201013,65383%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201112,25584%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
201216,03185.4%
Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements
201318,53787.5%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc
201420,53288.2%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged
201521,07590.1%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged
201622,20691.2%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged
201718,76791.7%
Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements
201815,08893.5%
Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a tyre seriously damaged
201913,15096%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a tyre seriously damaged, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen
202010,51396.4%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a tyre seriously damaged
202110,27796.9%
Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a tyre seriously damaged
202231197.4%
Top failures: wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, windscreen in such a condition that visibility through swept area is seriously affected, an obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning

Mileage at test

25th percentile
53,372 mi
Median
62,889 mi
75th percentile
107,837 mi

Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.

Check MOT history on GOV.UK