Lexus Is200
MOT data from 9,982 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 79.3%. Average mileage at test: 115,021 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 429 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 309 |
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 234 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 225 |
| a tyre seriously damaged | 222 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 212 |
| headlamp reflector or lens slightly defective | 184 |
| a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 182 |
| a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 159 |
| a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | 158 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol | 8,847 | 79.1% |
| Diesel | 1,109 | 80.5% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 670 | 79.3% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a tyre seriously damaged, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2000 | 609 | 77.8% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2001 | 1,186 | 79.9% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2002 | 1,532 | 78.3% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | |||
| 2003 | 1,705 | 79.4% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2004 | 1,989 | 79.1% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, headlamp reflector or lens slightly defective, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2005 | 1,171 | 79.8% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2010 | 114 | 78.1% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution., a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage | |||
| 2011 | 678 | 81.9% | |
| Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2012 | 163 | 79.8% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
90,817 mi
Median
109,454 mi
75th percentile
136,492 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK