Mitsubishi Shogun
MOT data from 48,908 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 80.8%. Average mileage at test: 103,589 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 2,491 |
| the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 1,928 |
| a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 1,010 |
| steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 853 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 853 |
| brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | 842 |
| vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced | 840 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 790 |
| significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake | 749 |
| a steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play | 713 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 46,801 | 80.9% |
| Petrol | 2,091 | 78.4% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | 186 | 71.5% | |
| Top failures: a seat belt anchorage likely to become detached in the event of a collision, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake | |||
| 1995 | 360 | 81.1% | |
| Top failures: vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake | |||
| 1996 | 493 | 78.1% | |
| Top failures: vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 1997 | 565 | 78.4% | |
| Top failures: body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 1998 | 982 | 82.7% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 1999 | 758 | 80.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2000 | 392 | 77.8% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2001 | 474 | 75.5% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2002 | 1,088 | 76.1% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced | |||
| 2003 | 2,064 | 74.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point | |||
| 2004 | 3,673 | 74.3% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced | |||
| 2005 | 3,549 | 74% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2006 | 2,956 | 73.1% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2007 | 3,459 | 75.5% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2008 | 1,897 | 75.8% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2009 | 1,204 | 77.7% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2010 | 1,936 | 75.4% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2011 | 1,876 | 80.5% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2012 | 1,184 | 82% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, exhaust system leaking or insecure, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2013 | 1,565 | 82.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2014 | 2,752 | 83.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2015 | 3,279 | 86.7% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2016 | 2,691 | 86.4% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2017 | 2,013 | 89.8% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2018 | 2,023 | 91.1% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | |||
| 2019 | 1,427 | 90.9% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2020 | 1,291 | 91% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2021 | 2,416 | 91.9% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
99,109 mi
Median
147,281 mi
75th percentile
182,483 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK