Toyota Hi-Ace
MOT data from 11,724 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 78%. Average mileage at test: 148,011 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 932 |
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 533 |
| vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced | 510 |
| brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | 345 |
| wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 329 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 305 |
| a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 273 |
| body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point | 254 |
| stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 174 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 167 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 11,213 | 78% |
| Petrol | 505 | 76.8% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 253 | 76.3% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point | |||
| 1997 | 422 | 75.4% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 1998 | 884 | 72.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 1999 | 777 | 74.9% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2000 | 388 | 71.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point | |||
| 2001 | 432 | 74.5% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2002 | 274 | 77% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | |||
| 2003 | 434 | 74.7% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point | |||
| 2004 | 445 | 77.1% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | |||
| 2005 | 496 | 75.2% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced, body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point | |||
| 2006 | 724 | 78.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | |||
| 2007 | 1,789 | 79.7% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced | |||
| 2008 | 1,729 | 80% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2009 | 926 | 80.8% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2010 | 881 | 81.2% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2011 | 492 | 83.9% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2012 | 110 | 81.8% | |
| Top failures: headlamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
115,631 mi
Median
135,690 mi
75th percentile
187,542 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK