Toyota Rav4
MOT data from 146,106 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 86.9%. Average mileage at test: 73,819 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 3,394 |
| the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 1,860 |
| a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 1,851 |
| a tyre seriously damaged | 1,793 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 1,728 |
| wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 1,706 |
| a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 1,641 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 1,312 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 1,187 |
| a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 1,106 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Hybrid | 67,612 | 93.6% |
| Diesel | 40,492 | 83.9% |
| Petrol | 37,944 | 78.1% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 539 | 73.1% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated, a suspension component excessively damaged or corroded | |||
| 1996 | 643 | 71.2% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated, lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer | |||
| 1997 | 863 | 69.4% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 1998 | 1,769 | 72.8% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, emissions levels exceed default limits | |||
| 1999 | 1,401 | 74.6% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated, emissions levels exceed the manufacturer's specified limits | |||
| 2000 | 739 | 73.5% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, emissions levels exceed default limits, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | |||
| 2001 | 1,624 | 74.4% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, headlamp reflector or lens slightly defective | |||
| 2002 | 3,037 | 76% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2003 | 4,103 | 76.4% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2004 | 5,309 | 76.6% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2005 | 5,337 | 78.2% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2006 | 3,949 | 74.9% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced | |||
| 2007 | 5,742 | 74.4% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2008 | 5,737 | 75.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2009 | 2,752 | 76.3% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | |||
| 2010 | 845 | 80.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage | |||
| 2011 | 740 | 85% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2012 | 2,470 | 85.1% | |
| Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2013 | 7,080 | 86.9% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative | |||
| 2014 | 6,907 | 87.5% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2015 | 7,616 | 89% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2016 | 11,568 | 89.4% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2017 | 11,392 | 89.8% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a tyre seriously damaged, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2018 | 10,968 | 91% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a tyre seriously damaged, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | |||
| 2019 | 12,847 | 95.5% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2020 | 15,641 | 95.5% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2021 | 13,536 | 96.1% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, a tyre cords visible or damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2022 | 821 | 95.9% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a tyre cords visible or damaged | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
37,602 mi
Median
53,524 mi
75th percentile
77,964 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK