Volvo S60
MOT data from 28,705 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 80.8%. Average mileage at test: 110,638 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 867 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 803 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 657 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 564 |
| a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 526 |
| a tyre seriously damaged | 520 |
| a tyre cords visible or damaged | 479 |
| a rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 456 |
| parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 429 |
| a steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play | 347 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 20,891 | 80.9% |
| Petrol | 7,778 | 80.6% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 515 | 73.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of led | |||
| 2002 | 1,030 | 76.9% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2003 | 1,497 | 74.9% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2004 | 1,908 | 73.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2005 | 2,224 | 77.2% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | |||
| 2006 | 1,766 | 75.6% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2007 | 1,037 | 73.3% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2008 | 596 | 74% | |
| Top failures: a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2010 | 1,075 | 82.1% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2011 | 2,682 | 82.6% | |
| Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2012 | 2,532 | 80.3% | |
| Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play | |||
| 2013 | 1,987 | 83.1% | |
| Top failures: a tyre cords visible or damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2014 | 2,096 | 83.6% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2015 | 1,978 | 84.2% | |
| Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2016 | 1,824 | 85.8% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2017 | 1,636 | 86.7% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
| 2018 | 1,298 | 88.7% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged, a tyre cords visible or damaged | |||
| 2019 | 881 | 90.1% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
82,079 mi
Median
111,967 mi
75th percentile
139,157 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK