Volvo Xc90
MOT data from 99,884 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 82.1%. Average mileage at test: 105,826 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 3,737 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 2,849 |
| parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 2,385 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 2,172 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 1,934 |
| parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value | 1,932 |
| a tyre seriously damaged | 1,832 |
| a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 1,472 |
| a steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play | 1,224 |
| a tyre cords visible or damaged | 1,072 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Diesel | 82,283 | 81% |
| Hybrid | 9,360 | 89% |
| Petrol | 8,150 | 84.5% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 1,419 | 71.7% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2004 | 4,076 | 72.4% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2005 | 6,003 | 73.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2006 | 4,696 | 72.8% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | |||
| 2007 | 4,677 | 74% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | |||
| 2008 | 2,834 | 76.9% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | |||
| 2009 | 5,316 | 78.5% | |
| Top failures: a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2010 | 8,991 | 77.6% | |
| Top failures: a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value | |||
| 2011 | 6,467 | 78.1% | |
| Top failures: a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value | |||
| 2012 | 4,304 | 81.9% | |
| Top failures: parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2013 | 3,527 | 81.5% | |
| Top failures: parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, parking brake efficiency less than 50% of the required value, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2014 | 3,160 | 81.9% | |
| Top failures: parking brake efficiency below minimum requirement, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2015 | 4,787 | 85.3% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2016 | 9,728 | 86.8% | |
| Top failures: a steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2017 | 9,363 | 88.9% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2018 | 10,597 | 89.8% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2019 | 8,683 | 90.2% | |
| Top failures: a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm, a tyre seriously damaged, a tyre cords visible or damaged | |||
| 2020 | 1,192 | 90.2% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, a tyre cords visible or damaged, a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
59,679 mi
Median
129,198 mi
75th percentile
155,639 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK