Toyota Yaris
MOT data from 653,262 tests in 2024. Pass rate: 82.7%. Average mileage at test: 68,760 miles.
Common failure reasons
| Reason | Count |
|---|---|
| a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 14,217 |
| a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 13,312 |
| the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 12,949 |
| tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 12,071 |
| wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 10,774 |
| a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | 9,980 |
| the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 9,524 |
| a tyre seriously damaged | 9,132 |
| brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | 8,558 |
| windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen | 7,710 |
Pass rate by fuel type
| Fuel | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Petrol | 493,980 | 81.4% |
| Hybrid | 123,114 | 89.4% |
| Diesel | 35,380 | 76.7% |
| OT | 389 | 82% |
| Electric | 383 | 83.3% |
By registration year
| Year | Tests | Pass rate | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | 2,901 | 69.4% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2000 | 6,147 | 70.9% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2001 | 11,754 | 71.7% | |
| Top failures: the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | |||
| 2002 | 15,040 | 72.8% | |
| Top failures: a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2003 | 19,527 | 72.4% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2004 | 23,606 | 72.4% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, the strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | |||
| 2005 | 28,140 | 73.1% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | |||
| 2006 | 26,689 | 73.7% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2007 | 31,081 | 75.2% | |
| Top failures: the aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | |||
| 2008 | 33,285 | 75.1% | |
| Top failures: a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2009 | 37,926 | 79.6% | |
| Top failures: a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | |||
| 2010 | 29,724 | 79.3% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2011 | 25,199 | 82.7% | |
| Top failures: brake pipe damaged or excessively corroded, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | |||
| 2012 | 42,632 | 83.5% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | |||
| 2013 | 45,283 | 84% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, a lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2014 | 44,594 | 85.3% | |
| Top failures: a spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2015 | 45,081 | 88.3% | |
| Top failures: tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of led, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2016 | 41,088 | 89.7% | |
| Top failures: a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of led | |||
| 2017 | 39,863 | 89.2% | |
| Top failures: a wheel bearing excessively rough, a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2018 | 40,573 | 90.9% | |
| Top failures: a wheel bearing excessively rough, a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2019 | 40,178 | 93% | |
| Top failures: wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
| 2020 | 22,191 | 94.4% | |
| Top failures: wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a tyre seriously damaged, tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | |||
| 2021 | 619 | 95.6% | |
| Top failures: a suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc, wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen, a tyre seriously damaged | |||
Mileage at test
25th percentile
80,003 mi
Median
102,541 mi
75th percentile
136,521 mi
Checking a specific vehicle? This page shows overall model statistics. To check the MOT history of an individual car, use the government service.
Check MOT history on GOV.UK